My colleague at the Seattle
City Attorney’s office was Sarah Ann (“Sally”) Buckley. She joined the office a
year or so after I, joining in 1978 or so, and was an intern until she could
take her Bar exam. She was quiet in person, but she was passionate about her
politics. She told me that a few years earlier, she had protested the Vietnam war, and as part of
her protest, she had refused to pay the tax on her telephone service. That tax was
earmarked to support the war, and it was a federal offense to fail to pay it.
Of all things, a prosecutor
in the Midwest—I am thinking Minnesota or Michigan—decided to prosecute Sally
over the pittance that was due. Now, my prosecutor friends will point out that
it’s the nature of the offense, not its magnitude, that is the crime—you are
just as guilty if you pinch one grape from a grocery store as if you steal a
whole ham. But if you consider the costs of a prosecutor, a judge, a courtroom,
and a public defender, you have to
question the public policy of criminalizing acts with very small consequences.
Sally completely admitted
refusing to pay her phone tax, and made her reason clear. The United States
District Court judge had no choice but to convict her, and to impose sentence. He ordered that she pay the tax, or go to
jail. Sally was fully prepared to go to jail, but hours before she was due to report for
incarceration, somebody paid the tax for her.
Her conviction issue came up when Sally
applied for admission to the Bar in Washington. She had to explain to the Bar
whether or not her crime was one of moral
turpitude. She wrote to the federal judge who had convicted her, asking “Do you
remember…?”
The judge replied at once,
saying essentially, “Yes, I certainly do remember you, young lady.” He
supported Sally’s petition to be admitted to the bar. He remembered that her
act was one of moral conviction, not an act of moral turpitude at all.
On the strength of the
judge’s letter, and others such as that from our boss, City Attorney Doug
Jewett vouching for her character, Sally was admitted to the bar.
She told me that she never
did find out who had paid her telephone tax—but she suspected that it was the
judge.
No comments:
Post a Comment